<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" ><channel><title>x-pose.org &#187; browser wars</title> <atom:link href="http://x-pose.org/category/browser-wars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://x-pose.org</link> <description>Tech Ramblings.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 14:08:54 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>Browser Wars: The Truth about Firefox 4.0</title><link>http://x-pose.org/2011/03/browser-wars-the-truth-about-firefox-4-0/</link> <comments>http://x-pose.org/2011/03/browser-wars-the-truth-about-firefox-4-0/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 02:12:16 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>brant</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[browser wars]]></category> <category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category> <category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category> <category><![CDATA[opera]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://x-pose.org/?p=243</guid> <description><![CDATA[I was just reading Maximum PC&#8217;s article reviewing modern browsers and they crowned Firefox 4 the best browser out there.  This is extremely unfortunate for a multitude of reasons and this post is my rebuttal.  It feels like Firefox 4.0&#8242;s feature list was created in response to using Opera and Chrome.  To put it more bluntly, [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just reading <a href="http://www.maximumpc.com/article/browser_battle_2011_who_new_king_web">Maximum PC&#8217;s article reviewing modern browsers</a> and they crowned Firefox 4 the best browser out there.  This is extremely unfortunate for a multitude of reasons and this post is my rebuttal.  It feels like Firefox 4.0&#8242;s feature list was created in response to using Opera and Chrome.  To put it more bluntly, <strong>Firefox 4.0 is nothing more than Firefox catching up to the competition</strong>.</p><p>I just heard a bunch of geeks gasp and clutch their mouse in complete horror.  How dare I say such a  thing! It has GPU acceleration out of the box, for christ sakes!   It&#8217;s gotta be good!  (Yes, thats a Maximum PC article dig)</p><h2><strong>Firefox copies features</strong>:</h2><ul><li>Firefox copied Opera&#8217;s menu in the top left-hand corner.</li><li>Firefox copied Chrome&#8217;s rapid development schedule.</li><li>Firefox copied Opera and Chrome&#8217;s simplistic interface motto (For example, Firefox now has tabbed extensions).</li></ul><h2>Firefox Improvements Debunked:</h2><ul><li>Firefox is FINALLY competitive in Javascript performance to Opera and Chrome.  However, Firefox 4 is not the fastest.</li><li>To improve security, Firefox 4 implemented something called HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security). The only problem is that no one supports this yet.</li><li>Firefox has GPU acceleration.  There actually is nothing wrong with that, but so does Chrome if you enable the labs feature.  In fact, I leave it disabled because GPU acceleration means little to nothing to me right now.</li><li>Firefox scores a 97 on the ACID 3 test, hurray!  Chrome and Opera only managed to get 100.  That was close.</li></ul><h2>Firefox&#8217;s Downfalls:</h2><ul><li>Firefox does not run plugins and tabs into separate processes like Chrome does.</li><li>Firefox does not bundle Flash with the browser for improved stability and security.</li><li>Firefox still takes longer to open on a PC than Opera or Chrome.</li></ul><p>So how exactly is Firefox the best browser?  Because of their 1,000,000 extensions?  By now, 99% of the good ones are available on Chrome too.  If you want to tell me Firefox is better for web developers then I agree.  Firebug, yslow, and pagespeed all kick butt.  That is what I use Firefox for, but not for daily browsing.  There are plenty of subtle things that Chrome does that I love, but I don&#8217;t have time to get into them now.</p><p>Now don&#8217;t get me wrong, I want to praise Firefox for finally doing some development work.  They must feel really good finally catching up to a 1 year old browser (Chrome).  Boy I sound bitter huh?  Maybe because I was a huge Firefox fan for 5 years and then a brand new browser came along and opened my eyes to Firefox&#8217;s flaws.</p><p>Sorry that this post sounds amatureish, but I don&#8217;t have time to develop a well thought out article.  I just had to get this off my chest. Feel free to leave comments about your thoughts.  I&#8217;ll be more than happy to update this post.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://x-pose.org/2011/03/browser-wars-the-truth-about-firefox-4-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>SunSpider Javascript test, Chrome Vs Firefox 3.6</title><link>http://x-pose.org/2010/01/sunspider-javascript-test-chrome-vs-firefox-3-6/</link> <comments>http://x-pose.org/2010/01/sunspider-javascript-test-chrome-vs-firefox-3-6/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:08:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>brant</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[browser wars]]></category> <category><![CDATA[chrome]]></category> <category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://x-pose.org/?p=56</guid> <description><![CDATA[Everyone must of heard the news that Firefox 3.6 has finally come out. There is a video mentioning all of the new changes in 3.6.  Mike Beltzner made mention of a benchmark called SunSpider and said that 3.6 had increased speed to 995 ms, down from 1188 ms.  I thought to myself, now that sounds [...]]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone must of heard the news that Firefox 3.6 has finally come out.  There is a <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/video/?video=whatsnew-3.6" target="_blank">video</a> mentioning all of the new changes in 3.6.  Mike Beltzner made mention of a benchmark called SunSpider and said that 3.6 had increased speed to 995 ms, down from 1188 ms.  I thought to myself, now that sounds like an interesting thing to put to the test to compare Chrome and Firefox.  Here are my own tests.</p><p>Firefox 3.6 with <a href="http://www2.webkit.org/perf/sunspider-0.9/sunspider.html" target="_blank">SunSpider</a>:</p><pre id="console">873.8ms +/- 1.9%</pre><p>Chrome Dev 4.0.295.0 with SunSpider:</p><pre id="console">408.2ms +/- 1.5%</pre><p>It turns out that I got a faster rating with Firefox.  However, Chrome is still <strong>more than twice as fast as Firefox</strong>.  So tell me, why are you still using Firefox as your primary browser?</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://x-pose.org/2010/01/sunspider-javascript-test-chrome-vs-firefox-3-6/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 4/10 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 232/240 objects using disk: basic

Served from: x-pose.org @ 2012-05-18 04:58:38 -->
